From Puritanism to Cosmopolitanism: Tracing the Intellectual Transformation in Muhammadiyah Thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/70xbz343Keywords:
Muhammadiyah, puritanism, cosmopolitanism, Islam Berkemajuan, Islamic modernism, intellectual transformationAbstract
This article systematically reviews how scholarship published up to 2020 has interpreted the intellectual transformation of Muhammadiyah from a movement commonly categorized as puritan-modernist toward an increasingly progressive and cosmopolitan Islamic orientation. Using a qualitative systematic literature review and thematic synthesis, it analyzes 19 scholarly works and three official or institutionally attributable Muhammadiyah texts. The synthesis identifies five themes: the culturally embedded character of early reformism; the consolidation of puritanism and institutional rationalization; the reopening of cultural and civic engagement; the articulation of progressive and cosmopolitan Islam; and the continuing limits of theological and organizational pluralization. The findings show that the transformation was neither linear nor a replacement of purification by pluralism. Purificatory commitments to tawhid, the Qur'an and Sunnah, and tajrid remained an enduring doctrinal core. What changed was the movement's intellectual repertoire: modern education, disciplined organization, cultural da‘wa, democratic citizenship, Pancasila, interfaith cooperation, humanitarian service, and global solidarity increasingly became legitimate fields of Islamic action. Cosmopolitanism is strongest in Muhammadiyah's educational, social, national, and humanitarian discourse, while doctrinal boundary-making and conservative currents persist. The article proposes a layered model in which a purificatory core supports rational-modernist infrastructure, cultural-civic negotiation, and a cosmopolitan-humanitarian horizon. This model explains Muhammadiyah's transformation as cumulative, contested, and institutionally mediated rather than as a simple ideological conversion.
Downloads
References
Alfian. (1989). Muhammadiyah: The political behavior of a Muslim modernist organization under Dutch colonialism. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Aljunied, K. (2017). Muslim cosmopolitanism: Southeast Asian Islam in comparative perspective. Edinburgh University Press.
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. W. W. Norton.
Bachtiar, H., Fadly, H., & Nurhakim, M. (2015). Visi kosmopolitanisme Islam di lingkungan Jaringan Intelektual Muda Muhammadiyah. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 5(2), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2015.5.2.455-485
Baidhawy, Z. (2017). Muhammadiyah dan spirit Islam berkemajuan dalam sinaran etos Alqur’an. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 13(1), 17–47. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v13i1.4202
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burhani, A. N. (2005). Revealing the neglected missions: Some comments on the Javanese elements of Muhammadiyah reformism. Studia Islamika, 12(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v12i1.647
Burhani, A. N. (2006). The ideological shift of Muhammadiyah from cultural into puritanical tendency in 1930s. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v8i1.178
Burhani, A. N. (2011). Lakum dīnukum wa-liya dīnī: The Muhammadiyah’s stance towards interfaith relations. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 22(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2011.586512
Burhani, A. N. (2013). Liberal and conservative discourses in the Muhammadiyah: The struggle for the face of reformist Islam in Indonesia. In M. van Bruinessen (Ed.), Contemporary developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the conservative turn (pp. 105–144). ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814414579-008
Burhani, A. N. (2016). Muhammadiyah berkemajuan: Pergeseran dari puritanisme ke kosmopolitanisme. Mizan.
Burhani, A. N. (2020). Between social services and tolerance: Explaining religious dynamics in Muhammadiyah. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814881128
Bush, R. (2014). A snapshot of Muhammadiyah: Social change and shifting markers of identity and values (ARI Working Paper No. 221). Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.
Federspiel, H. M. (1970). The Muhammadijah: A study of an orthodox Islamic movement in Indonesia. Indonesia, 10, 57–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350635
Fuad, M. (2002). Civil society in Indonesia: The potential and limits of Muhammadiyah. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 17(2), 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1355/SJ17-2A
Fuad, M. (2004). Islam, modernity and Muhammadiyah’s educational programme. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 5(3), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464937042000288697
Harijanto, C., & Chalmers, I. (2013). Transforming the writing of history: The new narrative of enlightenment within Muhammadiyah. Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs, 47(2), 63–90.
Hidayat, S. (2004). Dakwah kultural dan seni-budaya dalam gerakan Muhammadiyah. Tajdida, 2(2), 172–187.
Khoirudin, A., Baidhawy, Z., & Mohd Nor, M. R. (2020). Exploring Muhammadiyah’s historical civilizational dimension of social reconstruction in Indonesia: Humanitarian and cosmopolitan approaches. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 15(1), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol15no1.13
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Mu‘ti, A., Ul Haq, F. R., Khoirudin, A., & Fanani, A. F. (Eds.). (2016). Kosmopolitanisme Islam berkemajuan: Catatan kritis Muktamar Teladan ke-47 Muhammadiyah di Makassar 2015. Muhammadiyah University Press.
Nakamura, M. (2012). The crescent arises over the banyan tree: A study of the Muhammadiyah movement in a Central Javanese town, c. 1910s–2010 (2nd enlarged ed.). ISEAS Publishing.
Peacock, J. L. (1978). Purifying the faith: The Muhammadijah movement in Indonesian Islam. Benjamin/Cummings.
Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah. (2010). Pernyataan Pikiran Muhammadiyah Abad Kedua: Zhawāhir al-afkār al-Muhammadiyyah li al-qarn al-thānī. Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah.
Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah. (2015). Negara Pancasila sebagai Dār al-‘Ahd wa al-Shahādah. Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah.
Qodir, Z., Jubba, H., Hidayati, M., Abdullah, I., & Long, A. S. (2020). A progressive Islamic movement and its response to the issues of the ummah. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 10(2), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v10i2.323-352
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.





