Non Partisanship Political Participation Muhammadiyah Citizenship Model

Authors

  • Nurul Fatmawati Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32506/v8fb7994

Keywords:

Muhammadiyah, non-partisanship, political participation, citizenship, civil society, political khittah, Indonesia

Abstract

This article systematically reviews the relationship between organizational non-partisanship and political participation in Muhammadiyah to formulate the movement's implicit model of citizenship. The review addresses a recurring paradox: Muhammadiyah formally refuses affiliation with political parties, yet its members, leaders, educational institutions, welfare networks, and policy bodies remain deeply involved in Indonesian public life. A qualitative conceptual systematic review was conducted on 18 analytical sources published no later than 2020, consisting of peer-reviewed articles, academic books, and official Muhammadiyah documents. Sources were coded by actor level, form of participation, citizenship claim, institutional boundary, democratic contribution, and reported tension. The synthesis identifies three differentiated arenas of citizenship. First, organizational non-partisanship protects Muhammadiyah from becoming an electoral vehicle and preserves institutional credibility across changing governments. Second, individual political participation recognizes members as autonomous citizens who may vote, join parties, contest office, and hold diverse political preferences. Third, collective civic participation is exercised through education, health care, philanthropy, policy advocacy, interfaith engagement, and humanitarian action. These arenas are mutually dependent but not automatically harmonious. Personalization of organizational authority, partisan spillover, elite capture, representational ambiguity, and uneven inclusion repeatedly test the boundary between institutional independence and political agency. The article proposes a differentiated citizenship model in which political restraint at the organizational level expands, rather than reduces, civic and political agency at other levels. Its democratic value depends on transparent actor differentiation, protection of organizational symbols, internal deliberation, and accountability for members who enter public office.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfian. (1989). Muhammadiyah: The political behavior of a Muslim modernist organization under Dutch colonialism. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Al-Hamdi, R. (2012). Dinamika Islam dan politik elit-elit Muhammadiyah periode 1998-2010. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 3(1), 161-196. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2012.0009

Al-Hamdi, R. (2013). Islam and politics: Political attitudes of the elites in Muhammadiyah 1998-2010. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 3(2), 267-290. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v3i2.267-290

Al-Hamdi, R. (2015). The Jakarta Charter in post-Soeharto Indonesia: Political thoughts of the elites in Muhammadiyah. Masyarakat Indonesia, 41(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v41i1.560

Al-Hamdi, R. (2020). The origin of the political consciousness in Muhammadiyah: An epistemological analysis toward Indonesia's Muslim-reformist movement. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society, 5(2), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.22515/islimus.v5i2.2706

Argenti, G. (2017). Civil society dan politik moral Muhammadiyah. Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana, 2(2), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.35706/jpi.v2i2.968

Biyanto. (2020). Promoting and practicing religious pluralism: Muhammadiyah experience. Journal of Social Studies, 16(2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v16i2.34711

Burhani, A. N. (2011). Lakum dinukum wa-liya dini: The Muhammadiyah's stance towards interfaith relations. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 22(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2011.586512

Fuad, M. (2002). Civil society in Indonesia: The potential and limits of Muhammadiyah. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 17(2), 133-163. https://doi.org/10.1355/SJ17-2A

Fuad, M. (2004). Islam, modernity and Muhammadiyah's educational programme. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 5(3), 400-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464937042000288697

Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.

Latief, H., & Nashir, H. (2020). Local dynamics and global engagements of the Islamic modernist movement in contemporary Indonesia: The case of Muhammadiyah (2000-2020). Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(2), 290-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420910514

Nakamura, M. (2012). The crescent arises over the banyan tree: A study of the Muhammadiyah movement in a Central Javanese town, c. 1910s-2010 (2nd enlarged ed.). ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814311861

Nashir, H. (2008). Khittah Muhammadiyah tentang politik. Suara Muhammadiyah.

Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah. (2010). Manhaj gerakan Muhammadiyah: Ideologi, khittah, dan langkah. Suara Muhammadiyah.

Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah. (2015). Negara Pancasila sebagai Dar al-'Ahdi wa al-Syahadah. Gramasurya.

Pratama, A. Y. (2020). Muhammadiyah dalam bayang-bayang demokrasi: Studi tentang perdebatan Muktamar Muhammadiyah ke-41 Surakarta. Indonesian Journal of Muhammadiyah Studies, 1(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.62289/ijmus.v1i1.15

Suwarno. (2020). Relationship between Muhammadiyah and politics in parliament democracy period: A case study in Banyumas. Indonesian Historical Studies, 4(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.14710/ihis.v4i1.6598

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30