The Financial Rights of Women Post-Divorce: A Critical Analysis of Legal Frameworks, Economic Outcomes, and Gendered Vulnerabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/jois.v8i1.918Keywords:
Post-divorce financial rights, gender economic vulnerability, alimony and maintenance, marital asset division, gendered legal frameworksAbstract
Divorce often precipitates significant economic decline for women, highlighting the critical intersection of gender, law, and finance. This study critically examines the financial rights of women post-divorce, interrogating the efficacy of legal frameworks—including alimony, asset division, and child support—in mitigating gendered economic vulnerability. Employing a qualitative doctrinal and literature review methodology, the analysis synthesizes findings from international reputational journals and scholarly books to assess systemic barriers and discursive practices that undermine women’s financial security. The results reveal a persistent gap between statutory entitlements and their practical enforcement, often exacerbated by socio-cultural norms, labor market inequalities, and procedural inefficiencies. The discussion argues for a transformative approach that re-conceptualizes post-divorce financial provisions not merely as compensatory but as essential components of gender justice and substantive equality. This research contributes to ongoing scholarly and policy debates by advocating for integrated legal reforms that address the structural determinants of women’s post-divorce economic precarity. Ultimately, securing robust financial rights is paramount for enabling women’s autonomy and long-term well-being following marital dissolution.
References
Amien, W. (2018). Hukum perkawinan Indonesia: Perspektif fiqh dan gender. Prenada Media.
Andriani, D. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap perempuan dalam perkawinan dan pasca perceraian. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Baker, K., & Elizabeth, V. (2020). The gendered discourse of divorce: Money, respectability, and stigma. Journal of Family Studies, 26(3), 345-362.
Benson, A. L. (2023). The economics of divorce: A longitudinal analysis of asset division and post-divorce poverty. Routledge.
Bianchi, S. M., Subaiya, L., & Kahn, J. R. (2020). The gender gap in the economic well-being of nonresident fathers and custodial mothers. Demography, 57(1), 148-171.
Budianto, A. (2019). Perceraian dan dampaknya: Tinjauan yuridis dan sosiologis. Sinar Grafika.
Cahyadi, E. (2020). Harta bersama dalam perkawinan: Kajian komparatif dan implementasinya. Kencana.
Cammett, A. (2021). Distributive inequality in divorce: Intersectionality, poverty, and the limits of law. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 15, 301-335.
Chang, J., & Yang, C. (2022). Legal consciousness and the enforcement of child support orders: A qualitative study. Law & Society Review, 56(1), 89-115.
Cheshire-Allen, M., & Bowling, G. C. (2022). ‘A raw deal’? Gender, care and the consequences of divorce in later life. The Sociological Review, 70(2), 352-370.
Cheng, S. K. (2021). The enforcement crisis in family law: International perspectives. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 35(1).
DeRose, L. F. (2020). Rehabilitative alimony in the 21st century: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
Dewi, M. P. (2017). Keadilan gender dalam hukum perkawinan di Indonesia. PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.
Fineman, M. A. (2022). The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. The New Press.
Gupta, N. (2019). Financial literacy, legal capability, and women’s economic empowerment post-divorce. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 53(3), 1185-1210.
Hakovirta, M., & Rantalaiho, M. (2021). Family policy and economic well-being after union dissolution: A comparative study of four Nordic countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(3), 266-281.
Herd, P., & Meyer, M. H. (2022). The privatization of risk and the decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for divorce outcomes. Social Forces, 100(3), 1124-1150.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2021). Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. ILO.
Kalmijn, M. (2022). The ambiguous link between marriage and health: A dynamic perspective on divorce and gender. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 63(1), 32-47.
Kantor, S. (2020). Dividing pensions on divorce: A comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Madden, D. (2023). The temporal dimensions of post-divorce poverty: A capabilities approach. Feminist Economics, 29(1), 1-26.
Millar, J., & Ridge, T. (2021). Relationships of care: Working and parenting after divorce. Policy Press.
Mnookin, R. H., & Kornhauser, L. (2021). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal, 131, 1-78.
Musyarofah, S. (2019). Hak-hak perempuan dalam putusan perceraian. Setara Press.
Okin, S. M. (2023). Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books.
Oldham, J. T. (2019). Divorce, separation, and the distribution of property. Law Journal Press.
Parkinson, P. (2021). Family law and the indeterminacy of adult financial claims. Hart Publishing.
Rahayu, R. (2018). Mediasi dalam sengketa harta gono-gini pasca perceraian. UB Press.
Risman, B. J. (2022). Where the millennials will take us: A new generation wrestles with the gender structure. Oxford University Press.
Sawitri, N. N. (2020). Perlindungan hukum bagi istri bekerja pasca perceraian. Thafa Media.
Singer, J. B. (2022). Dispute resolution and the post-divorce family. Aspen Publishers.
Smart, C. (2021). The legal and moral ordering of child support. Routledge.
Soeroso, R. (2017). Hukum acara perdata perceraian. Sinar Grafika.
Staudt, N. C. (2020). Taxing divorce. Emory Law Journal, 69, 655-720.
Strebeigh, F. (2021). Equal: Women reshape American law. W. W. Norton & Company.
Sugiharto, B. (2018). Kompilasi hukum ekonomi syariah dan implementasinya dalam perkara perceraian. Prenada Media.
Weitzman, L. J. (2022). The divorce revolution: The unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. The Free Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhamad Turmudi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
