Beyond Textual Comparison: Developing an Intertextual Framework for Hadith Matn Criticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/2hvzba04Keywords:
hadith matn criticism, intertextuality, textual variants, isnād–matn analysis, Qur’an–hadith relations, historical contextualizationAbstract
Hadith matn criticism has long drawn upon comparison of reports, scrutiny of linguistic anomalies, and reconciliation of apparently conflicting narrations. Yet the relationships among textual variants, Qur’anic discourse, and historically situated interpretation are not always described within a single analytical procedure. This conceptual study develops a three-dimensional intertextual framework through critical engagement with classical hadith-critical concerns, historical scholarship on transmission, and contemporary theories of textual relationships. Its proposed dimensions are intra-hadith intertextuality, Qur’an–hadith intertextuality, and historical-discursive intertextuality. The analysis differentiates observable textual correspondences, interpretive inferences, and historical claims requiring independent corroboration. It further proposes an eight-stage workflow for defining a corpus, comparing variants, mapping scriptural and contextual relationships, assessing alternatives, and checking the limits of authentication claims. The resulting framework treats intertextuality as a complement to isnād and matn criticism rather than an autonomous test of prophetic attribution. Its contribution is a transparent conceptual architecture for analyzing textual relationships without conflating semantic coherence with historical authenticity. Because no systematic corpus-based validation is reported, the framework remains a methodological proposal requiring comparative application and further refinement.
References
Allen, G. (2022). Intertextuality (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Azami, M. M. (1977). Studies in hadith methodology and literature. American Trust Publications.
Berg, H. (2000). The development of exegesis in early Islam: The authenticity of Muslim literature from the formative period. Curzon.
Brown, J. A. C. (2008). How we know early ḥadīth critics did matn criticism and why it’s so hard to find. Islamic Law and Society, 15(2), 143–184. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851908X290574
Brown, J. A. C. (2009). Hadith: Muhammad’s legacy in the medieval and modern world. Oneworld.
Brown, J. A. C. (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The challenge and choices of interpreting the Prophet’s legacy. Oneworld.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Donner, F. M. (2010). Muhammad and the believers: At the origins of Islam. Harvard University Press.
Genette, G. (1997). Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree (C. Newman & C. Doubinsky, Trans.). University of Nebraska Press.
Görke, A., Motzki, H., & Schoeler, G. (2012). First-century sources for the life of Muhammad? A debate. Der Islam, 89(2), 2–59.
Goldziher, I. (1971). Muslim studies (Vol. 2; C. R. Barber & S. M. Stern, Trans.). George Allen & Unwin.
Hallaq, W. B. (1997). A history of Islamic legal theories: An introduction to Sunni usul al-fiqh. Cambridge University Press.
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Juynboll, G. H. A. (1983). Muslim tradition: Studies in chronology, provenance and authorship of early hadith. Cambridge University Press.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art (L. S. Roudiez, Ed.; T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
Lucas, S. C. (2004). Constructive critics, hadith literature, and the articulation of Sunni Islam: The legacy of the generation of Ibn Saʿd, Ibn Maʿīn, and Ibn Ḥanbal. Brill.
Motzki, H. (Ed.). (2002). The biography of Muhammad: The issue of the sources. Brill.
Motzki, H. (2005). Dating Muslim traditions: A survey. Arabica, 52(2), 204–253.
Neuwirth, A. (2019). The Qur’an and late antiquity: A shared heritage (S. Wilder, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Schoeler, G. (2006). The oral and the written in early Islam (U. Vagelpohl, Trans.; J. E. Montgomery, Ed.). Routledge.
Shah, M. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of Qur’anic studies. Oxford University Press.
Sinai, N. (2017). The Qur’an: A historical-critical introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Robinson, C. F. (2003). Islamic historiography. Cambridge University Press.
Wansbrough, J. (1977). Quranic studies: Sources and methods of scriptural interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahlidin Jamaluddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
