Al Jarh wa At-Ta'dil in Researching Sanad Hadits

Authors

  • Heru Widodo IAIN Purwokerto
  • Fahmi Irfanudin UMY Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v3i1.547

Abstract

In Islam, the hadith has apposition  as the number two source of Islamic law after the Qur'an. However, not all hadiths can be used immediately. There are hadiths that are not used as a legal basis, because after investigation, it turns out that certain hadiths do not originate from the Prophet Muhammad PBUH. Using a literature survey, this article found that the science of Jarh wa ta'dil is a science used to find out the negative and positive nature of the narrators of the hadith which has an influence on the quality of the narration that was narrated. By mastering the science of jarh wa ta'dil, it can select which hadiths are authentic and which are not valid, especially in terms of the quality of the narrators of the hadith, not in terms of obedience. There are several methods that have been studied and determined by the scholars in explaining the narrators' narration of the hadith, both in a defective state and in a tsiqah state. Among these are: Honesty in providing judgments, careful in researching and evaluating someone, paying attention to ethics and manners in the jarh, and mentioning the causes of disability or weakness of narrators of the hadith. The scholars of jarh wa ta'dil disagree regarding the statements of the problem of jarh wa ta'dil regarding their assesment of narrators of the hadith. Some scholars give a negative value and some others rate positively. If for example it happens in such a way, then further research is needed that is more directed to the truth. In examining the hadith, especially regarding the character of the narrators of the hadith, it is obligatory to refer to several references, so that the results of the research can be objective. Therefore, this article recommends further research, specifically how to implement the theory of jarh wa ta'dil in determining good leaders in this globalization era.

 

References

Abdurrohman, M, and Elan Sumarna. Metode Kritik Hadits. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.
Abu Ghuddah, Abdul Fattah. Lamahat Min Tarikhil-Sunnah Wa ‘Ulumal Hadits. Syiria: Maktab al-Mathbu’ al-Islamiyyah, 1984.
Ash Shiddieqy, M. Hasbi. Sejarah Dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadits. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1988.
Asror, Miftahul, and Imam Musbikin. Membedah Hadits Nabi SAW, Kaedah Dan Sarana Studi Hadits Serta Pemahamnnya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
Bukhari. Shahih Al- Bukhari. Beirut: Dar Ibnu Katsir, 1987.
Departemen Agama RI. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Bandung: Diponegoro, 2010.
Gufron, Mohammad. Ulumul Hadits Praktis Dan Mudah. Yogyakarta: Teras, 2013.
Ismail, Muhammad Syuhudi. Kaedah kesahihan sanad hadis: telaah kritis dan tinjauan dengan pendekatan ilmu sejarah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1988.
Ismail, Syuhudi. Pengantar Ilmu Hadits. Bandung: Angkasa, 1987.
Khatib, Muhammad ‘Ajjaj al-. Ushul Al-Hadits: ‘Ulumuhu Wa Mushthalahuhu. Dar al-Fikr, 1989.
Khon, Abdul Majid. Ulumul Hadits. Jakarta: Amzah, 2012.
Mahmud, Ali Fayyad. Metodologi Penetapan Kesahihan Hadits. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 1998.
Ma’luf, Louis. Kamus Al-Munjid Fi Al-Lughah Wa Al-‘Alam. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’ashir, 1997.
Noorhidayati, Salamah. Diktat Ulumul Hadits. Tulungagung: STAIN Tulungagung, 2002.
Nurudin. Manhaj Al-Naqd Fi ‘Ulum Al-Hadits. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr al-Mu’ashir, 1997.
Solahudin, M, and Agus Suyadi. Ulumul Hadis. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia, 2009.
Sumbulah, Umi. Kritik Hadis Pendekatan Historis Metodologis. Malang: UIN Malang Press, 2008.
Suryadi. Metodologi Ilmu Rijalul Hadits. Yogyakarta: Madani Pustaka Hikmah, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-17

How to Cite

Widodo, H., & Irfanudin, F. (2020). Al Jarh wa At-Ta’dil in Researching Sanad Hadits. Journal of Hadith Studies, 3(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v3i1.547